These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The introduction of handheld devices and the internet has transformed our lives. It has changed the way we communicate, do business and access information. The boom of technology has undoubtedly more advantages than disadvantages.
To begin with, new technology has enabled people to contact their loved ones in a fraction of seconds. This is mainly seen as a benefit in the cases of long distances where mobile phones and instant messaging is a relief to stay connected with the person. It allows us to chat and share pictures and videos. Similarly, through the facility like webinars and video conferencing is used to organise a business meeting with people from different part of the world. It has eliminated the need to travel to attend the meetings. The advantages are seen in the personal and professional worlds.
On the other hand, the disadvantage of the internet and cellphones is that people get engaged in hateful debate with each other. Many times, people differ from each other opinions and express the same using social media platforms like Twitter and WhatsApp groups. Instant connection to the internet with mobile leads to many unlikely events being posted on the internet. Several cases are seen where people face insult and embarrassing situation by such acts of others. It invades the private life of others if not used appropriately.
In conclusion, the use of internet and mobile has entirely changed social interactions. More awareness and controlled policies can eradicate the disadvantages. It brings people closer and projects a transparent society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2766798419 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9135127075 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9283367108 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5294117647 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175786965748 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479770174733 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350901502564 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985089535173 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108312456493 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.