The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include an

Essay topics:

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.

Nowadays many people believe that benefits of nuclear power far outweight disadvantages however I think they are omiding negative aspects of it. In case of an accident occurance at one of the facilities that uses nuclear power the area effected will be larger than many people thought.

There is a thought saying that nuclear weapons are maintaining World peace. This thought is a heritage for our society from cold war era. During cold war times people were thinking that having nuclear weapons protects you nuclear attacks of other countries. However people were not thinking that a nuclear strike would require a nuclear response so this situation would end in a nuclear. In my opinion the only way of maintaining World peace is by demolishing nuclear weapons.

Furthermore some people even argue that nuclear power provides clean and cheap energy when compared with convantional energy sources like petrol and coal. However people who are thinking like that does not compare nuclear energy with other clean power sources including solar power and wind power. In near future efficency of renewable power will be increased as scientists develop more efficent and reliable solar cells and wind turbines so that nuclear power will be more costly than renewable energy sources.

As a conclusion I should say that I disagree with both of the ideas mentioned above. I argue that we can not have a clean and bright future with nuclear energy. We should reduce the number of nuclear weapons all over the World and scientists also speed up their researches for more efficent and reliable energy sources.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...you nuclear attacks of other countries. However people were not thinking that a nuclear...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...response so this situation would end in a nuclear. In my opinion the only way of maintain...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e is by demolishing nuclear weapons. Furthermore some people even argue that nuclear pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...al energy sources like petrol and coal. However people who are thinking like that does ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stly than renewable energy sources. As a conclusion I should say that I disagr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, i think, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11787072243 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4369627833 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54752851711 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6992614127 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.538461538 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330377788639 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133477721945 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666913954264 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192713963698 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052028495199 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.