I agree to the statement that the benefits of nuclear technology outweigh the disadvantages. But I would like to say that now-a-days, there is a paradigm shift, wherein the most powerful country in the world is responsible for maintaining peace.
In continuation to the above, it means that a power enrich country is driving other countries on this basis. The underdeveloped country is somehow forced to mind and follow the practices that are being defined by the developed one. For example, the trade exchanges are being done on the basis of rules and regulations that are being set by the powerful one. Such over-powering behaviour should be minded at the global level.
In contrast, the use of power should be capped at development of human race only. For example, electricity generated from nuclear power is cheap and clean. That is, the pollution levels are controlled when generation of electricity is done through nuclear power. In a country like India, where pollution levels are very high, such means of electricity generation can help in reducing of pollutants.
Moreover, usage of nuclear power will eventually help the country in bringing down it's dependency on other nations for resources like electricity. The monetary savings that are achieved out of this can be used in development of other areas. In addition, the country which has developed the technology behind nuclear power can help in setting-up the infrastructure in other countries that can also benefit from the same.
In the end, as quoted by someone, with great power comes greater responsibility. That is, usage of power should only be done for the development of mankind so that the world can be made into a better place for living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should be minded at the global level. In contrast, the use of power should be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09893992933 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88142990803 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512367491166 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5274836012 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191990073098 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840596361022 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961258116547 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130804000316 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854302137362 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.