A wide range of teenagers spend their plenty of time to play computer games and rarely go out for sports. I tend to agree adolescent ought to spend more time playing sports rather than stay indoor to play games on a computer. Therefore, this is a highly debatable topic in contemporary society nowadays, and will, examine the above opinion in this essay.
One of the arguments of the truths is the game has been changed by high-technology dramatically. High-technology provides numerous of games in various devices without costly payment, which derives colorful and interesting content in the game that attracts adolescent a lot. Another significant reason in favor is that there is no enough free time for adults like the old generation. Especially the employers live in an urban area, who has work overtime frequently but rarely time with their children. Moreover, it is hard for youth to find a playground in the city, sometimes the game is the only choice for young people.
This development is negative for human body but maybe have a positive way for the future. People are getting lazy and they are no desire for a healthy life without enough exercise. For instance, in the movie Wall-e, all the human live in a spaceship, their hands, and toes almost gone because they do not need to use their foot to walk and face the screen to press a button just like a game. The positive opinion is scientists approved games can develop human brain well in some ways. If we use our brain more in the game world, we have a chance to get more benefit from that.
To sum up, it is a controversial topic for a human to ensure which opinion is the best. If the producer could create more game to help people do more sports in their real life, that would be considered in modern society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67301587302 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58507061278 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584126984127 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5333996023 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20187432166 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670635656793 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733445367879 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119937875628 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862420901457 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.