It widely considered that playing computer games promote the harmful occasion for youngsters rather than beneficial ramification. I completely agree with this statement because a non-active lifestyle, which closely related to modern technology, may bring many curable or uncurable diseases for new generation children.
To begin with, modern technologies advancing rapidly, which currently plays a crucial role in human life and also has a significant influence on children's consciousness via virtual games. For instance, in Japan, according to ASIAN statistics negotiation, at a rough estimate every third kid become ' internet- addictive', which brings considerably damage to the environment such as dropping the level of school tuition in primary school classes. Therefore, local authorities implemented a large-scale program to deal with the pressing problem.
Secondly, upbringing children have undergone remarkable changes by virtue of modern technology over the two decades. Nowadays, the vast majority of parents are too busy, which led to this inevitable consequences, so that's why internet videos moderately altering children's views irrespective places where they reside. To illustrate, many children have become criminals by the impact of virtual games such as GTA.
To conclude, perhaps using or playing computer games have negative effects on children, but if only children will still play without control their parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a rough estimate every third kid become internet- addictive, which brings consid...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...led to this inevitable consequences, so thats why internet videos moderately altering...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 208.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89423076923 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98572788544 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.764423076923 0.561755894193 136% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.839131424 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.222222222 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135885416542 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556582882115 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571331502105 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930821212677 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669079395942 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.53 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.