Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
Vaccinating children has become increasingly unpopular among certain demographics of the society. These people assert that vaccinations are hazardous to children's health and as such are not needed. While there might<span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="there "></span> be few potential risks involved; however, I believe vaccinating against spreadable disease is entirely imperative.
To initiate, parents have always been way of vaccinating their children. They are justifiably worried about injecting their children with unfamiliar substances that could potentially make them sick. In other words, parents naturally feel protective for their children. Undoubtedly, there have been some recorded instances of children unfortunately reacting adversely to their injections. These few instances have bolstered existing fears in parents that vaccinations are not necessary and potentially more dangerous than the possibility of contracting the communicable disease itself.
Despite the minor risks associated with vaccinating children, the idea that they are unnecessary and dangerous is completely preposterous. Vaccines have prevented vast number of deaths over hundreds of years in countries around the world. The number of death, so for, prevented far outweighs the number of children who have been adversely affected by the immunizations themselves. Some diseases have actually been completely eradicated through vaccination campaigns. Overall, the idea that vaccination is unnecessary and hazardous is ill-informed and dangerous in itself and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for society.
Henceforth, it is concluded that timely vaccinations have several positive impacts on children's health even if there are some minor side effects, which could be<span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="which "></span> ignored easily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, however, if, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4880952381 5.12529762239 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.1775349564 2.80592935109 149% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9645188998 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193093262288 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748509935451 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237299730173 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117511257078 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291594400476 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.07 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.