Traffic congestion is gaining ground among the urban areas: which is faced by the people globally. One possible solution is given by individuals, raising the tariff on petrol will result in overcoming the traffic problem. At the global scale, not only affluent nations but also financially weaker societies are, nowadays emphasising on finding out the possible effects with certain solutions. Therefore, the pros and cons are the facets of the same coin; the benefit of every solution generates certain side effects.
Imposing the tax would discourage car owner from using their cars as it would become very expensive to drive. This would mean that they would begin to make use of public transport which leads to reduce traffic problem and pollution as well. Most of the people for long distance, for instance, will use public vehicles as it would be cheaper than driving own car. Owing to, considerable usage of public transport will lead to improved facilities. It is often seen the case that public transport in cities is poor. For example, old buses and trains that would rather not use, high taxes would generate enough money to make the necessary changes. In the UK, trams-train has been introduced for the people to get around in every nook of the corner of the UK, at a very reasonable price. Hence, the scheme was inclined to lessen the traffic problem and achieved to do so.
Nevertheless, there are certain drawbacks to such a solution. This would be a heavy onus on the car drivers. At present, taxes are already high for a lot of people, and so further taxes would only mean less money at the end of the month for most people, who may have no choice but to drive every day. In addition, this type of tax would likely be set at a fixed amount and only hit those with less money harder, whilst the rich could likely to afford it, continue the use of private vehicles for their own use. Therefore, it is not a powerful approach to curb the traffic problem.
To conclude, this solution is worth considering improving the current situation, but there are advantages and disadvantages of introducing such a policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82240437158 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50725752384 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560109289617 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9618591705 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870065524358 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336384920701 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039133161532 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478661799509 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394387893198 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.