When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
when a nation produce a newly built technology then it often wipes out the customs skills and link life to a new standard of living based on technology. I strongly believe that it is useless to store them instead embrace the technology.
Firstly, Technologies have become so disruptive in nature that now a days they are responsible for automating the task which was earlier done by human intervention. For example, In Information technology sector data scientist's produce easy and simple to use bigdata software which can draw reports and dashboards for chief marketing officer while removing the need for a SQL developer. Furthermore, companies, colleges and economy are reaping the benefits of the technology for their needs and wants.
Secondly, virtual communication nowadays are being used frequently by people because it is instant, faster and provides a reliable connection to person on the other part of the globe. In addition to this, it can be used on any form of device be it mobile or laptop.
However, the traditional skills and old ways of life should not be ignored completely instead we can preserve those old skills and ways of life which made a big contribution to the economy at that time.
To conclude, I think that it is beneficial for us to embrace technology however we should preserve only some of the finest old custom skills and life who made a dramatic impact on economy at a certain period in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when a nation produce a newly built technolo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ave become so disruptive in nature that now a days they are responsible for automating the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...become so disruptive in nature that now a days they are responsible for automating the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94238683128 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79939462613 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609053497942 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4349643293 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.444444444 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7777777778 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109649351119 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456099871636 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526235067893 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685877497683 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624164845153 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.