While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Can the personality of an employee outweigh the education credentials and work experience? As a matter of fact, more often than not it is observed by many a man that, while hiring an employee one must look into the nature of the person as it would reflect how they will manage the people around them so that the work potential of every employee reach to its maximum level, another school of thought suggests that a preference to more educated and experienced worker should be employed. I completely agree with the former view because being a team player in a working environment will encourage everyone on a positive level which will improve the working capacity of the individuals.
Arguably, an institute is as strong as its weakest worker has not attained much value in the contemporary era for no reason. As in a working environment a person will only grow at a faster pace if the coworkers are available to help them in their time of a problem, so in recent times the employers are looking for such personal qualities who are good at resolving conflicts between the group of workers. The individual competence of an employee can not only aid in enhancing the potential of their coworkers but also, they will form a sane and healthy atmosphere. For instance, in a painstaking research by Harvard University, it was revealed that 7 out of 10 workers will show a rise in the problem solving when the team they are working in have better bonding, rather than those who are working in a separate cubicle with no interaction with each other.
Notwithstanding the brighter side, while the opponents argue that highly educated and experienced workers are able to resolve those issues which arise out of the complexity of the work. Although it is not entirely untrue that education denotes the level of research and study about the profession, however, this generally makes an employee have a sense of superiority from the other workers, which leads to office politics owing to the egoistic issues between the workers. For example, no sooner was a survey done by the Forbes Magazine on the chain of command in an institute, than it was revealed that those who are at a higher position of the hierarchy creates hurdles in the working of their juniors so that they can retain their job creating a barrier between them and eventually lowering the working potential.
To conclude, but for any doubt’s individual characteristics of a worker must be given importance to make a better workforce. Therefore, if a balance between the qualities as well as the experience of workers is created in a working environment, it would eventually lead to a socially stable and intellectually prosperous society; lest good outcomes should be far out of reach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-05 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-05 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | HARANMOL SINGH | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | javaduddupudi | 52 | view |
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in the universities Is this a bad or a good idea 78
- Due to television and the internet it is easier today for a large number of people to become famous Is it a positive or a negative development 92
- Some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people to eat healthier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles aunt and grandparents is better rather than only by parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and examples 67
- Nowadays the crime rate is increasing especially among teenagers What are the reasons behind it How can we reverse this trend 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painstaking research'.
Suggestion: painstaking research
...nd healthy atmosphere. For instance, in a painstaking research by Harvard University, it was revealed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88841201717 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83004825559 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517167381974 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.8891265957 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.833333333 106.682146367 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8333333333 20.7667163134 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115409012612 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456704874276 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377740949304 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726116624547 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307359836275 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.