Write about the following topic.
Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Being famous is a blessing for many and a boon for a few. If often comes with positive and negative effects of invasion into their private lifestyle. Sometimes, media channels invade the privacy of a celebrity and treat them with utmost disrespect while many try maintain a distance and do not invade their personal space. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and provide evidence as to why famous personalities should be given more privacy.
Firstly, a well known person is often tracked by many multimedia companies that enter into their personal life. Sometimes. these organizations hold grudges against these famous people and speak ill about them on television shows. One must understand that public blindly follow these channels and believe whatever is being telecasted on this huge platform due to which long time earned name becomes unpopular among the people. For instance, Sanjay Dutt, a well known identity was greatly impacted with news channels and newspapers which advertised that he was a terrorist. For many years the actor and his family had to suffer the consequences of this false news.
Secondly, it is important to note that news channels must not misuse their advertising platform as many peoples' livelihood is dependent on fame and popularity. A boundary must be set by media and should maintain certain limitations by respecting the privacy of these personalities. For example, Amitabh Bachan is duly adored by many citizens. Earlier media channels spoilt his name amongst public by treating him unfairly and spreading false rumours about him. But later, these channels stopped invading in his personal matter and maintained a distance by treating him respectfully and displaying news that was meant to be advertised. Hence, the need to set a wall by multimedia is necessary so that privacy of these famous people are protected.
To conclude, being popular can be both advantageous and disadvantageous at times but care must be taken by many people by often granting them their personal space and not invading it by respectfully letting them live their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun try seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tries'.
Suggestion: many tries
...treat them with utmost disrespect while many try maintain a distance and do not invade t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...er into their personal life. Sometimes. these organizations hold grudges against thes...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...suse their advertising platform as many peoples livelihood is dependent on fame and pop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19411764706 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73722891723 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7154497271 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250096313433 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849735139469 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407533720011 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163057208189 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426089905117 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.