It is observed that youngsters expend the most of their free time in shopping malls, therefore, many people believe that it would be detrimental for the juveniles as well as on the community. If asked, I also strongly agreed with this statement. My explanation is elaborated further in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, other activities are more important rather than wasting time on shopping. In recent years, due to the advancement of technology, teenagers do not perform physical activities. Despite wasting free time in the shopping area, it is better to utilize that time by doing some physical activities. It is beneficial for fitness and healthy youngsters more useful for society.
Apart from that, the shopping centers are not pocket friendly. Despite having financial problems, the youth spent money blindly while purchasing new items for the glamourous lifestyle. This trend is not only unfavorable to the family and young citizens but also the society. For example, in India, many teenagers frequently disburse money on new mobile phones and clothes.
On the other side, visit often shopping malls could help youngsters to be in fashion trends. If young people stop spending time in the shopping area, they would not aware of the latest fashion trend. The youth of African countries, for example, due to financial reasons, do not get the privilege to explore new arrivals and as a consequence, they do not have fashion sense compared to youngsters of other developed countries.
To sum up, it can be eventually commented that spending more time in shopping areas is affecting the growth of the young. Though it has some minor advantage, my arguments are considered me to believe that it impacts negatively on the youngsters and the general public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ts negatively on the youngsters and the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74999123175 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5812110087 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176485879276 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572704553027 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432416469558 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962334296021 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191853532117 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.