Many people believe that over the years, standard of the paintings, sculptures and dance is gradually decreased, therefore, they suggest that ancient artworks considered as a 'masterpieces'. I strongly differ of this statement. My further explanation is elaborated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The foremost reason of my disagreement is that such a practice would demotivate the current artists. Indeed, there are lots of creators whose creation is extraordinary. If work of those artists would not praised, then they would change their career. For example, despite making quality songs, folk singers of India have not rewarded with awards; as a result, many folksong originators stop making a beautiful songs.
Besides this, some newly generated artworks are more beautiful and important compared to an ancient creations, so these artworks need to get proper recognition as like the aged artworks. Such as, dance style of Micheal Jackson. It is modern dance style; however, it is a cutting edge form of dance, must be considered as a masterpiece of art. Moreover, many painters use different materials like clay, rubber, thread to make the pictures, which is not done in last centuries. Those work also accepted as a great creation of all time.
On the other side, some citizens argue that the recent artworks are not have a good quality compared to the ancient creations. For instance, the great painting of Monalisa, it has an unique attribute and design, other painting cannot be compared with it. Therefore, such a creation only remarked as a masterpiece.
To conclude, it can be eventually commented that, in recent years uniqueness in arts rapidly declined, meanwhile some great creation of artworks is still occured. While many believe that only ancient creations should be considered as a masterpieces, I believe that new artworks also acknowledge well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a masterpiece' or simply 'masterpieces'?
Suggestion: a masterpiece; masterpieces
...est that ancient artworks considered as a masterpieces. I strongly differ of this statement. M...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'praise'
Suggestion: praise
...ary. If work of those artists would not praised, then they would change their career. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'song'?
Suggestion: song
...ong originators stop making a beautiful songs. Besides this, some newly generated ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'creation'?
Suggestion: creation
...ul and important compared to an ancient creations, so these artworks need to get proper r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... argue that the recent artworks are not have a good quality compared to the ancient ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the great painting of Monalisa, it has an unique attribute and design, other pain...
^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...be eventually commented that, in recent years uniqueness in arts rapidly declined, me...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a masterpiece' or simply 'masterpieces'?
Suggestion: a masterpiece; masterpieces
...cient creations should be considered as a masterpieces, I believe that new artworks also ackno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32094594595 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87105519056 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6583314345 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179394553542 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455127934826 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486745714662 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094711615065 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443575152083 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.