To be labeled a ‘Work of Art’, a painting, sculpture or other art forms should display certain qualities that are unique. However, over the past century, there has been a decline in the quality of prize-winning artwork and it is now possible for quite ordinary pieces of art to be labeled ‘masterpieces ’ whilst true works of art pass unnoticed.
Do you agree or disagree?
There are rules used as a basis to justify the worth of an artwork. In the past, many artists in history have been recognized for achieving these qualities; displaying exceptional masterpieces like Da Vinci, Picasso, Michaelangelo, and Van Gogh to name a few. But in recent times, there have been new forms of art and new artists have emerged shrouding the real pieces that were ought to be works-of-art which I greatly disagree.
The rise of new artists and new forms of art does not mean the past art pieces are neglected. Since this generation consists of a new set of audience, the qualities sought in the past have changed. It all depends on the eye of these new judges that cause the new art form to be recognized along with the previous masterpieces.
The notion of how new arts that are considered today as a masterpiece are seen by some as not suitable work-of-art is unacceptable. This is the modern era, the taste of people have changed. If these exact people lived in the past, the kind of art that artists present today will also be possibly recognized as a work-of-art in the past. So, it is wrong to say that this considered modern work-of-art is not a true masterpiece.
Therefore, the past art pieces are not clouded by new artists’ pieces. Instead, it is still remembered in art museums and exhibits as the greatest arts of all time, inspiring new artists to create their own style and dominate the art industry by showcasing bold artworks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: WERE_MD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where ought'?
Suggestion: where ought
... emerged shrouding the real pieces that were ought to be works-of-art which I greatly disa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71595330739 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78787732671 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533073929961 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0780587699 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254058388703 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103745094392 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533571276453 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163733838523 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134539663247 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.