Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss both advantages and disadvantages

It is fact that citizens in recent years are making unwanted noises which affects many people, therefore, group of people suggest that effective laws should be introduce to regulate the noise-makers. These laws should have the merits and the demerits, so both the advantages and disadvantages are illustrate in the ensuing paragraphs.

Examining the positive side, an introduction of strict laws to control the noise would beneficial for students. Unnecessary voice by people could disturb the students to focus on their study, which results in poor academic growth. Library, schools, reading rooms, for example, need a calm atmosphere, however, rigid acts of noise could stop the people to make noise in these areas. Moreover, legislations could bring peace at the hospitals and at the prayer halls, where people always want a calm surrounding.

On the other side, the negative effects of these acts could not be ignored. To start with, such laws demolish the human rights; every person is free to speak. Such as, democratic contry like India and the USA give right to their citizens to perform activities as per their choice. Besides this, loud noise are produced in the most celebrations and parties. Although peace is important factor for human being, social rituals and celebrations of enjoyable moments are also required. Practising these legislations, celebrations could be performed silently, which will lead to depressed society.

In sum up, it can be eventually commented that people are making too much voice in the recent days. Too loud noise is annoying for people, therefore, some strict acts must be applied. However, entire nation not required such an act, meanwhile, these laws could be applied only on sensitive places like library, schools, hospitals.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'introduced'?
Suggestion: introduced
...e suggest that effective laws should be introduce to regulate the noise-makers. These law...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'illustrated'.
Suggestion: illustrated
...th the advantages and disadvantages are illustrate in the ensuing paragraphs. Examining...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31205673759 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68534090609 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0559233563 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289849316481 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873265250821 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627768979472 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179700386882 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801333550436 0.056905535591 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.