The given pictorial depicts the evolution of the horse from the past 40 million years and also compared the leg structure of them over the time.
Overall, it can be said that modern horse has the strongest body and leg pattern compared to past breeds, size of the latest horse also increased over the years.
Examining further, 40 million years ago, horse was known as an Eohippus, which was smaller in size and had a tiny leg bones compared to other later spices.
Mesohippus, which was exist 30 million years ago, was the upgraded version of Eohippus. Mesohippus was look like a Mcrychippus which was lived 15 million years ago, however, Mcrychippus was stronger than Mesohippus and Eohippus.
Moreover, in modern era, Mcrychippus is known as a horse. The foot structure of the horse is different than all other past categories of horses. Modern horses have proper structure of leg bones, which makes them more stronger than other ancient breeds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...rse was known as an Eohippus, which was smaller in size and had a tiny leg bones compared to ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... later spices. Mesohippus, which was exist 30 million years ago, was the upgraded ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...oot structure of the horse is different than all other past categories of horses. Mo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...tructure of leg bones, which makes them more stronger than other ancient breeds.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00625 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45661574885 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7051729445 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18151792954 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874789193203 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558158180389 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115257091675 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470937807064 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.