Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Support your argument with your own experience.
Young people are more eager to learn and have current ways of performing a job while older employees remain stuck in their ways. I agree with the statement, as younger people are more open-minded and have fewer responsibilities.
Fresh hires are optimistic about their future. They work with a mindset that sky is the limit, and they want to change the world by working hard. Not only do they realize that they are early in their careers, but also give their best to make a place in a company. To illustrate, when I graduated and joined a company as a software engineer, I used to work over 9 hours a day to make a meaningful impact on the product. The desire to do better differentiates a young employee from an old one.
On the other hand, older employees get comfortable in their place. Once a worker has spent some time in a company, they stop looking for better ways of doing a job. Instead, they always opt for time tested ways, as they are familiar with them, and it involves less risk. Besides, the priorities change as they grow older. To illustrate, most of the older employees are married, and they must give time to their families.
To conclude, it is true that young workers have more enthusiasm to work because they have fewer responsibilities and want to make a name for themselves. However, once people grow older, families and experience play an import part of their decision. In short, young people are better employees than the old ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, so, thus, while, in short, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6833976834 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63580188716 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9509346064 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8666666667 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151641655834 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585714712698 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539531524713 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113000247768 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669688841761 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.