Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses discovered clay jars by villagers during constructing railroad line. Based on an archaeologist proposal, the vessel was an old electricity producer, whenever filled with liquids. The author of the article states that there are several evidences for rejecting the proposal. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that there have not been seen any attached conductors to these discovered vessels, and they were found lonely. However, the speaker explains that local people have found these vessels, and because of not being archeologists, they would have seen attached conductors but they did not gather them, owing to the fact that they were not interesting enough to pay attention.
Second, the writer proclaims that there were the same copper cylinders in the ruins of Seleucia, and the vessels should have had the same purpose, which was holding scrolls of sacred texts. Yet again, the lecturer underscores that it is true that discovered issues in Seleucia were not vary from the vessels, but it does not prove anything. Ancient inventors might fill them with liquids, then they found out the electricity power of their invention. It means that the vessels may have had other functions but they were adapted by inventors later.
The final point of contention between the reading and the listening passage is lack of electrical devices. The writer thinks that there were no devices which work with electricity at that time. Thus, the electricity power of the vessels was useless. On the other hand, the speaker explains that the vessels were able to make a shock for people, like an invisible power. So, the ancient people could have used them not only to show their fake magical power but also, to heal patients by stimulating their muscles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
... discovered issues in Seleucia were not vary from the vessels, but it does not prove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, second, so, then, thus, well, as to, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12297734628 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50506760087 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556634304207 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0718906084 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126980179867 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450051507265 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647432019459 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798302579301 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721430219861 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.