agree or disagree: a child should learn about finance management sicne young age
The time one spends during childhood to manage financial resources is one the most crucial periods in life; as it contributes to the total savings amounts and life quality and shapes the ensuing life. As far as I am concerned in the state of ambivalence, I might lean toward an agreement to this statement. Conceivably, some people believe that children are too young to concern about economics, however many reasons such as the ability to manage expenditure improvement and practical management enhancement can declare a higher beneficiary of teaching young people about finance handling. I will interpret my points in the following essay.
First, the ability to manage money is advantageous due to the valuable money can save that included in this ability. Doubtlessly, this money help to broaden the back account savings and consequently will enrich's one's life quality. To build this ability a certain amount of knowledge is needed. Knowledge such a how valuable money is, how one can make better financial choices, etc. which can not be learned in a short amount of time. Granted a person is a genius to manage money without any learning period, but a normal person needs to learn an ability. As an illustrative example, some years ago when I first started high school at Beheshti high school in Iran there was a girl, named Sara. Sara's parents had taught her the ways to save money since childhood. In the beginning, everybody loathes her, saying how conservative she is about money, but it was not true. Fortunately, she made her first business at the age of 17. Although she was meant to represent a peasant, things did not go as everyone predicted. As one can see, practicing money management helps to perfect this ability which associates with the time one starts learning it.
Secondly, it is not presumptuous to think practice makes perfect. Although no man can truly master an ability based on time, one assumes that a person who starts to learn a concept will master it faster due to the amount of spent time. A relatively rich person might have started to save money from a young age and there are times a person from a middle-class family can start a market based on his savings through childhood. My personal experiences are the foundation of my point; practicing an ability directly influences the level of perfection in it and it is imperative to the feasibility of using it. Surely, it is wiser to learn saving money since childhood than denying it and becoming poor in the adolescent.
I am of the conviction that one needs to know the money management and some practical management. It is a personal suggestion that affects total savings and life quality. Regarding the aforementioned reason, I believe that parents should teach their children about money management. All in all, a coin has two sides and an edge to connect them, so it would better to start teaching children at the right age, not too early or too late
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t savings and consequently will enrichs ones life quality. To build this ability a c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to save'.
Suggestion: to save
... using it. Surely, it is wiser to learn saving money since childhood than denying it a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85884691849 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73598955605 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504970178926 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9341227796 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.76 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.12 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140984013691 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375621780506 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477597682415 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937469075212 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329853764466 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.