all students and professor take place face-to-face with other
There have been pros and cons regarding the argument that all students and professor take place face-to-face with other .
While both sides may have their own reason to support their argument, I totally agree/disagree with this statement with several reasons and examples as follows.
To start with, taking place face-to-face with other is a great way for students and professor to broaden perspective on the real world.
This is attributed to the fact that it offers opportunities for students and professor to have a balanced view point and get-up-to date knowledge.
Over the decades, today’s rat-race society has been changing and evolving at a surprising speed with such a hectic life style .
Therefore, they are hard pressed for time and feel depressed or drained by the increasing amount of work such as research or homework.
However, in this context, many of students and professor would like to expand and widen our intellectual horizons through students and professor to do
sex and pelacio with other, which makes students and professor think differently about multiple things.
This is because it allows students and professor to look outside the box and approach things in a different way.
Thus, this proves that all students and professor take place face-to-face with other
All things considered it is my belief that regarding this topic has been effectively and precisely with the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...essor take place face-to-face with other . While both sides may have their own re...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and examples as follows. To start with, taking place face-to-face with other is ...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sing speed with such a hectic life style . Therefore, they are hard pressed for t...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... widen our intellectual horizons through students and professor to do sex and p...
^^
Line 8, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sex and pelacio with other, which makes students and professor think differently...
^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tiple things. This is because it allows students and professor to look outside t...
^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ook outside the box and approach things in a different way. Thus, this proves that all students a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essor take place face-to-face with other All things considered it is my belief th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 228.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31578947368 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78118169932 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600877192982 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9444108558 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.580187900397 0.236089414692 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260242052404 0.076458572812 340% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.256643271025 0.0737576698707 348% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255752512319 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.279015478518 0.0645574589148 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.