The company would like to invest in improving employees’ work. Which way do you think is better?
-to help employees become more adept to new technology
-to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious
For the sophisticated work of employees, companies choose various statistics. While some company buys new advanced technology for helping workers, some improve their working environment to be more comfortable. It is so controvertible for companies to make absolute decisions. In my view, their productivity will be enhanced by the rehabilitated working environment for workers. They can profoundly communicate with their colleagues, ease the stress of their working tasks, and acquire brushed motivation for their work.
To begin with, remaking working places makes plentitude of opportunities to talk with their fellows. Communication with each employee is most significant for high production in the company. On the other hand, the design of working desks does not fit in the working style to communicate with each other in workers. Therefore, it is not enough for them to plan other tasks or ask for advice between them. Hence, the surplus will be gradually getting better by easily communicative places.
Secondly, workers obtained their stress ease their feeling by innovated their working places. Some people hold deep stress to think about the contents including their company. It connects with low working products because employees sometimes quite from their works and are late to go to their companies by their stress. Nevertheless, once the company decides to reconstruct the building, the feeling of workers will be refreshed, like first-year workers. As a result, the working quality will be distinctly boosted.
Finally, companies can keep the incentive of workers culminated by recreated their working places. It is certainly difficult for people to continue highly motivation in companies. Generally speaking, there are reasons such as uncomfortable chairs for each desk, unfitted color orders on the walls, and old fashioned furniture for their motivation. When a company solves each concern by their workers, workers will work frantically for vastly productions.
To sum with, the company should make the solution for its production more by rehabilitated buildings than new technology. I surely believe that they definitely purse for their high productions by communicable places, comforted their feelings, further motivations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-08 | akimasa7887 | 76 | view |
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to young people 93
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier for people to maintain good health than before 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66472303207 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97362944887 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562682215743 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3702440649 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5238095238 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196952995712 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730275369196 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601724279892 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120043710326 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546606190764 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.