Cooperation between people can accomplish great things that one person cannot. In college, a group of students can learn better by sharing their knowledge with each other as they work together on a project. It seems that the teacher should always assign projects for the students on which the students must work together. However, it depends on what kind of issue we want to solve in the projects.
For issues like social science or political science, it is indispensable for students to discuss and exchange their ideas with each other. If we always do the projects alone, we may neglect a lot of aspects that are important. For example, when discussing the environmental issue, most people will support the idea to protect nature, however, there are many regions where people cannot be fully self-sufficient without utilizing the environment resources. It would be more balanced for learning about this issue if we could discuss both ideas from the perspective of different people.
On the other hand, when students are doing projects on the topics of math or computer science, it is more suitable for them to work alone. For example, proof of math theory is complicated and needs highly concentrated. If two people want to work together to complete the proof, it will be much more inefficient. For computer programming, if two people want to write together in implementing one function, it also degrades the efficiency of both people. When doing projects of these topics, cooperation may be a barrier, instead. A more appropriate approach is reviewing. Someone completes the entire project, and the other person reviews the project and points out what the first person missed. In this way, people can be more efficient without overlook any aspects.
As a student in college, I agree that projects on which students must work together can help a lot when people have a bias on different issues. However, it also depends on the topic of the projects. If we can do the projects on math or computer science alone, and work together for the projects on social science or political science, it will be more efficient for us to learn things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... college, a group of students can learn better by sharing their knowledge with each ot...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, so, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9860724234 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69632703281 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473537604457 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0581034552 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2105263158 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358228247808 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117652149764 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127028458927 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258746167655 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107328531506 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.