Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Since time immemorial, history subject consistently remains its paramount position in the university’s curriculum. Notwithstanding emerging viewpoints as to whether students should be exempted from learning history, I, as a fervent advocate, assure that academic skills, critical thinking refined and sense of national identity formed would be by far the strongest evidence for the presence of history in education.
First, further searching into history facilitates students in honing necessary studying skills. Needless to say, in light of reading thousands of materials or books regarding how history has developed, learners are able to sharpen their writing and their scan and skim skills in reading simultaneously. My personal experience has driven me to immerse myself in history. Instead of being perplexed in reading an extremely thick book as most other fellows, I, after several history courses, am able to locate exactly essential information for my writing. Intriguingly, with the formal writing styles of noted authors who wrote history books, my writing style and voice are more logical and stronger than previous time inasmuch as I can figure out which academic vocabularies or useful sentences should be employed in my essay.
Second, history learners’ critical thinking is enhanced positively. Now that historical events are interrelated; therefore, as to understand comprehensively, readers are required to link different chains of events to make suitable evaluations. From that, history can do more than showing information, what it actually creates is forming students’ well-round perspectives. A soaring number of teachers laments that their students are inclined to accept new information without question, which adversely negates learners’ critical thinking. However, the story seems to go differently with the aids of history classes. Learners become meticulous in absorbing new information, which is apparently expressed through several searches for information’s authenticity.
Second, the history subject can mold young learners’ patriotism from recognizing national identity. Experiencing a multitude of wars from civic riots to foreign invasion, each country proudly depicts its glory history to young generations through pages of history books. Through further digging into history, students are likely to define what creates the differences between their mother country and other regions in this globe. The result is that after each individual instills the value of patriotism, they would become active in shielding their homeland’s peace and identity. These abstract things, however, cannot normally be taught through some short-term classes or by some moving and eloquent speeches, it needs time and endeavors from learners to decipher and unveil.
In conclusion, history must be a compulsory subject in every single university in view of its benefits towards learners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...um. Notwithstanding emerging viewpoints as to whether students should be exempted from learni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 778, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from learners to decipher and unveil. In conclusion, history must be a compuls...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85680751174 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02020735214 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615023474178 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4603446233 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.315789474 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197153606906 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571352341981 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338378038768 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108465380275 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156118602785 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 10.9000537634 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.