Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Human-being have plenty of impact on the earth including negative effects and positive impacts such as maintaining certain species and land. Personally, I believe that the former heavily preponderate the latter, which signifies human-being is destroying the nature. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people are producing the magnitude of pollution which is deleterious to the environment and other living creatures. Needless to say, factories are contaminating water streams by putting the waste water, and polluting atmosphere with smoke. In addition, there are several minor factors such as air pollution produced by each individual. To be more specific, the air pollution and greenhouse gas in the atmosphere has increased due to these activities. As a result of this, average temperature of the global climate has increased, which means many animals, especially animals that live in the polar region may extinct.
Secondly, the new type of invincible predators named hunters are killing living creatures for many reasons not only to eat. Of course, people need to hunt certain amount of animals in order to get nourishment. However, wearing clothes made of fur and utilizing tools of ivory is not the essential need of people. Unfortunately, people are hunting many animals in order to satisfy their luxurious but not essential need. Consequently, a ton of individual animal are suffering.
Finally, mankind is taking advantage on the big portion of natural resources, especially water and land. Hence, other living things cannot continue their life normally. For instance, since people began developing the agriculture, overall extent of wooded area has diminished. Furthermore, enormous amount of water streams have become defunct because of irrigation. Thereby, waterfowls, fish and plants growing in the water have confronted their demise. Moreover, many municipal areas of countries are playing a role of hindrance for some animals which migrate for a long distance. In consequence, these animals are unable to relocate to different areas because they cannot go through urban location. Altering these animals' niche, natural process of living, is detrimental for these animals.
In summation, I am of the opinion of living creatures are suffering in light of influence of human’s activity. This is because people are producing pollution, hunting animals and exploiting abundant resource.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, people are producing the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t live in the polar region may extinct. Secondly, the new type of invincible pre...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 716, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... through urban location. Altering these animals niche, natural process of living, is de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54330708661 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90227955653 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595800524934 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6632806403 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8260869565 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5652173913 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78260869565 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0602149274873 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167950453111 0.076458572812 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252337456848 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374566276767 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168111946386 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.