It is hard to deny that a job is best only when it fits you, which leads impressionable people to conclude that people should wait for a job that would be more satisfying rather than take it immediately once getting a secure job. However, such a statement suffers from logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as basic guarantees, attitude changes, and intense competition are concerned, I firmly hold that accepting a secure job is appropriate.
First and foremost, a secure job provides more guarantee, as it is much easier to find other jobs with a secure job. Meanwhile, nowadays, the working force is so competitive that even those with high education degrees or strong capabilities cannot get a satisfying job. Refusing a secure but staying unemployed to wait for a satisfying job is full of uncertainty. Not to mention that a secure job can give people economic support and working experience, helping in getting other jobs in the future while waiting for an unguaranteed offer, probably giving nothing.
Furthermore, people's attitudes towards a job they used to complain about always change after times, indicating that accepting a secure job but unsatisfying may not be as bad as most people's perceptions. Usually, candidates who pick secure jobs are overqualified. Hence there are more opportunities for them to show their talents and get promoted. Take the case of my cousin, who was promoted three times last year due to his excellent performance. I still remembered that he complained about the job when he just got the position. However, now he shows intense satisfaction with this seemingly secure job. Had it not been for the try on this secure job, my cousin would never have such achievement in his career today.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that only with a satisfying job can people find a successful and meaningful life. Ironically, many people tend to hold an unrealistic expectation of a satisfying job for which they are not qualified, ignoring the intense competition in job markets. Some people with no unique talents may desire to find a job in a high-end office building, enjoying competitive salaries and extended vacations to take, waiting for a satisfying job, they might not be able to gain a job forever if they do not seize the chance of a secure offer. Therefore, since the job markets have become highly competitive, people should cherish the offer of a secure job, even it is not quite a satisfying one to them.
In a nutshell, I maintain that taking a secure job right away is wiser than waiting for those satisfying unguaranteed offers. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from Penelope Fitzgerald goes, it is interesting to note that everyone has a different take on the world, a different opinion, and given the same inputs have completely different outputs, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
It is hard to deny that a job is best only when it fits you, which leads impr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...who pick secure jobs are overqualified. Hence there are more opportunities for them t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01425661914 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92570427072 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523421588595 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5327819208 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.238095238 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481338251185 0.236089414692 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152050972649 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914991242574 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28690062448 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581180621888 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.