Together with the improvements in society, it seems rather ironic that increasing the professor's salary will enhance the quality of education. Thus, the question has been raised as to whether universities should increase the salary of their professors or not. While it is undeniable that both arguments have their own merits to boast; if forced to choose one over another, my resolute standpoint is definitely in line with giving out more salary to the professors and I will explain the reasons why in the following essay.
To begin with, additional investment in the lecturer's salary can motivate them to teach harder and productively. In other words, professors will work harder with a passion to teach the students which can improve the student's academic performance by expanding their minds. I assume that a personal example can shed light on this notion. A couple of years ago when I was studying at the University of Manchester, lecturers that receive high income devotes their time to teach me the chapters that I am having difficulties to cope up. On the other hand, professors whose salaries are lower than others do not manage their time to teach the weaker students. Should universities pay more to the professors, they will feel satisfied and they will eventually teach the students with determination and enthusiasm. It is clear with this example that professors deserve a pay rise.
Moreover, raising the professor's wages can attract more professional teachers. In fact, a survey conducted by the American education community shows that educators are always looking for an institution that gives out more salary. This is because most of the teachers have to find a second job to support their families. My Biology teacher is a compelling example of this. He works as a private tutor during the weekend because of the low wages he gets. Besides, If more jobs are fulfilled then universities could provide more classrooms and extra classes for the under-privileged students. This clearly shows why professors need to get more wages.
All in all, I strongly believe that universities should raise the teacher's salary because of the reasons mentioned above. Therefore, nothing in my mind cast doubt on my stance regarding the given statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...seems rather ironic that increasing the professors salary will enhance the quality of educ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ion. Thus, the question has been raised as to whether universities should increase the salary...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...egin with, additional investment in the lecturers salary can motivate them to teach harde...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ieve that universities should raise the teachers salary because of the reasons mentioned...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, in fact, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15760869565 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82996702707 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5111799714 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8947368421 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287551701034 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809861900098 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454885016559 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164004081642 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035315303067 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.