Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Internet is the need of the hour for this century, but not more than public transportation. Personally, I believe that the government should not give priority to the internet over public transportation. I feel this way for three reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, public transportation is a basic need of society, which cannot be compromised. Thousands of people travel through public transportation each day. The government should rather show more concern to public transportation. Giving second priority to this cause is indirectly injustice to the people of the country. Most of the working-class people, who help generating revenue, travel through metro, buses, etc. Moreover, most of the people cannot afford their own vehicles to travel, they just have only one option and that is public transportation Government should be more concerned about poor or middle-class people. Especially, the government of developing and the third world countries should focus more on their infrastructures and construction of public transportation instead of the internet.

Secondly, Public transportation is the sole responsibility of the government and they should focus on the issue. People elect politicians and representatives so that they can focus on the primary necessities of society, which is not the internet definitely. Additionally, the internet can be improved without more interference from the government. Internet is generally improved by corporates, companies and small firms. The government can focus on bigger issues and leave other issues on the government. They can also form a department to look after the internet and its application.

Finally, the overall development of the country depends on infrastructure such as transportation. This sector helps the government generate huge revenue as people pay for the services. The more facilities the services have the more revenue the governemnt is likely to generate. Moreover, it would provide many people jobs. The transporatation is a vast field and capable to provide jobs in many sector such as construction, monitoring, maintainance, etc.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that government should not focus more on internet than public transportation.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to generate' or 'generate'.
Suggestion: to generate; generate
...t of the working-class people, who help generating revenue, travel through metro, buses, e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...option and that is public transportation Government should be more concerned abou...
^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sector seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sectors'.
Suggestion: many sectors
...st field and capable to provide jobs in many sector such as construction, monitoring, maint...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5726744186 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37123961735 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4425280577 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1363636364 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213579669802 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718239774088 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650735010424 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144788981394 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598796631194 0.0645574589148 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.