Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people think that the government should work on improving the access to the internet. People think that by having abetter internet access, most people will be able to achieve their goals. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I think that government should work on improving the public transportations. The basis of my opinion is educational and social.
From and educational perspective, having a better public transportations will help most of the people to have a better education. For example. If there are adequate public transportations available for the the people, that will facilitate the learning process. For instance, all the universities and colleges are locates in Boston, for students to enrolled in universities they have to go to Boston. Going to Boston need students to use the trains or the buses. If there are enough buses and trains available at different time of the day, students will be able to go back and forth between their homes and their universities. Consequently, the improving of the public transportations will enhance the percent of people want to get a higher level of education.
Socially, having a better public transportation will increase the social network among the people. for instance, most of the employees going to their work using their cars. If we have a better public transportations , that will allow people to use the trains and the buses rather than using their cars. People in the public transportations can communicate with each other, they could talk and make a good relationships. In the mean time public transportations is at the best way to protect our community from pollution. If people eliminate the usage of individual cars and proceed to use public transportations, that will help our community to stay healthy. less carbon dioxide will be excreted in the air thus people will have better heath. That is why I think that not only the improvement in the public transportations will increase the communication among people, but also it helps people to stay healthy.
In conclusion for the reasons I mentioned above, I believe that the improve of the public transportations is a good chance to help people to have abetter education. Also, improve of the public transportations will help most of the people to get long together. Finally public transportations help the whole community to stay healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I think that government should work on improving the public transportations. Th...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...te public transportations available for the the people, that will facilitate the learni...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...te public transportations available for the the people, that will facilitate the learni...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the public transportations will enhance the percent of people want to get a high...
^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...level of education. Socially, having a better public transportation will incr...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n will increase the social network among the people. for instance, most of the em...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...e the social network among the people. for instance, most of the employees going ...
^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple. for instance, most of the employees going to their work using their cars. If...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... we have a better public transportations , that will allow people to use the train...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
... other, they could talk and make a good relationships. In the mean time public transportation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Less
...ill help our community to stay healthy. less carbon dioxide will be excreted in the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...asons I mentioned above, I believe that the improve of the public transportations is a good...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ost of the people to get long together. Finally public transportations help the whole c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13775510204 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1329800053 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420918367347 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2060872633 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5454545455 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1478581255 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605554335679 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498871225652 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112944186721 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214668101362 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.