In the modern era Internet play a pivotal role in the worlds. In fact, access to the new technology and the internet has prepered development environment for human to rich to the indispenseble factor inorther to develop their countries. despite government are investing money on Internet qualification, some people believe that it is very crucial to pay attention to the publi transportation rather than internet. I am not convince with this opinion. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the folowing essay.
First and formost, considering the fact that todays human are facing lots of scientific question about the evolutionary theories which are known as the certain and critical problems. In other words, people need acces to the high quality of internet in order to address the millions of evolutionary questions to help the survival of humanity. more over, investing money on engineering projects are also needed the internet. One of my own example is a good case in point. I was working as a engineer in the transportation infrustructures. we were facing to build the bigest air line and other institite were supose to solve the resaearch on causes of the earthquic that had hapened former. the government spend all their limited budget on developing internet whci was the case that both of us were needed to taht.
Second, the internet make access easier and cause people save their time. It goes without saying that If the government spend money on developing internet access to each other will become easier. Althogh transpotatiopn hepl people accecc each other, the internet make the access but in e easy and accelerated speed. The recent resulst of the research shows that some development countrirs which their policies made their mind to spent more mony on developing internet were more successfull rather thous who invest on transportation.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that government better to invest on the developing internet rather transportation. It is not only help bothe transpotation and scientific institutes but make people connected to each other by saving mony and in a swifted way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Despite
...or inorther to develop their countries. despite government are investing money on Inter...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'convinced'.
Suggestion: convinced
...ortation rather than internet. I am not convince with this opinion. I feel this way for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
...tions to help the survival of humanity. more over, investing money on engineering pr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a good case in point. I was working as a engineer in the transportation infrustr...
^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... in the transportation infrustructures. we were facing to build the bigest air lin...
^^
Line 2, column 688, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the earthquic that had hapened former. the government spend all their limited budg...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12034383954 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93788929406 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54441260745 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8931342237 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2777777778 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176136196306 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589873172693 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424305359099 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109524898616 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041139398257 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.