Truth be told, helping disadvantaged people has provoked a lot of controversy in recent years. Some people believe that nowadays people offer a helping hand to needy people more than past while others hold the opposite view. I consider myself in the former group and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, thanks to technology, in modern life people are more aware of their surronding world. This means that they can find underprivileged people and investigate their crucial needs easier in comparison to the past. To clarify, these days everyone has access to Internet, and can read news about phenomenons happening. For instant, last year an earthquake happened in one of the cities in my country. Getting Informed about this catastrophic event, people all around the country tried to help individuals who had undergone this event. kindhearted people collect a great amount of cloths, food, and money for the ones who suffered from the earthquake, and helped them provide their basic needs. This compelling example shows that since people are more conscious and aware about the world nowadays, they have inclination toward being helpful more than past.
Secondly, nowadays, there are countless campains that try to motivate people to help others and do their moral duty. These campaings try to bold the consequenses of helping others on the whole globe. For instance, lots of campains have been created to encourage people help needy people in Afghanestan. These campains try to increase people's awareness about the situations in that country, and they tell stories about how a small help can change the path of life of an Afghan child, and in the near future, this child can be a righteos and influential person. This stories persuade people to be generous and helpful. However, in the past, such campains did not exist, and thus, people's insight was very limited.
In conclusion, taking into account what was already mentioned, I strongly believe that nowadays people are more willing to be generoust not only because of techolongies which hightend people's awareness but also as a result of campains' endevour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Kindhearted
...dividuals who had undergone this event. kindhearted people collect a great amount of cloths...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...n be a righteos and influential person. This stories persuade people to be generous ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1452991453 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6469521091 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2799226417 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.235294118 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35188726574 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116469306808 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753630122729 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219203135206 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521595773166 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.