Today we live in a modern world where we heavily rely on technology, which plays an essential role in our daily lives. For instance, access to social media, watching shows through programs, meeting people online, and studying through platforms. Due to the advanced technology that exists, citizens have the advantage of living in a safe environment, ensuring children get the education required and commodity. Although the lifestyle we are practicing may look good, overall, it is no mystery that it will have a negative impact on future generations.
A controversial debate that many discuss is whether our contemporary way of life will have a detrimental impact on future generations, and opinions are varied. However, I believe that current living standards will be a challenge to the next generations. Those who disagree may argue that our society is improving over time, but I firmly think that this is the case for three key reasons, which I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
First, despite the positive aspects of our lifestyle, it is evident that our use of plastic and other resources will affect the decisions and paths of the future. Drawing from my own experience, when I was young, it was common to go to the beach and do various activities, such as swimming, collecting seashells, and reusing plastic cups to build sand castles. However, presently, the number of plastic being used and thrown away is increasing drastically, especially during the pandemic, leading governments globally to alter and create policies related to recycling plastic or banning the use of plastic. Nevertheless, in spite of these restrictions, people continue to utilize plastic through food deliveries, school projects, and one-time items. It is crystal clear to see why the amount of plastic will continuously grow, causing future generations to have more environmental issues and problems with plastic.
Second, with the growing population, I affirm that competition will be heightened and resources will be shortened, causing more stress and problems concerning academic and economic opportunities. To illustrate my point, when I moved from Guatemala to South Korea, I realized that the educational level in Guatemala was viewed as low and common sense in South Korea. The reason is mainly that students from elementary to college go to 1-1 tutors or academies to receive higher education than in their schools in order to outshine other students. Besides that, with a great number of people working in business and politics, plus a few people in agriculture, it is obvious that resources like oil, coal, and food will be reduced, causing prices to rise tremendously, resulting in their having an economic struggle, which would not allow them to strive but suffer slowly.
To sum up, I hold the position that our actions will cause more harm than good due to unwise decisions we make on using resources and growing populations, despite claims that future generations will have a better life as a result of expanding knowledge, wiser policies, and developed science.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, such as, as a result, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24291497976 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8840407127 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7101695355 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.352941176 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0588235294 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257201215343 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750939182555 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755252046716 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140581520834 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688322254176 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 86.8835125448 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.