Since the dawn of civilization, traveling has been a non-separable part of people's lives all around the world. Some people hold the view that they will benefit more from travelling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Some others hold a different perspective, which proposes that travelling abroad is more beneficial than travelling in national tracts and cities. I personally concur with the latter viewpoint. The following paragraphs will delineate my perspective toward this issue.
First of all, travelling abroad gives the opportunity to visit different ecology and geography. In other words, by travelling to other countries which have different climates and nature, there is a chance to see lots of sightseeing, landscapes or even animals that you have never seen before in your own country. For example, I remember when I was in India three years ago. The weather in India was too different from where I came from, it was hotter, and humidity was too high. I have seen dense vegetation and jungle which was really interesting for me. Also, I visit some animals closely such as tigers and lions in Bombay national park. It wasn’t possible for me to experience such an amazing time in my own country.
Secondly, by traveling to other countries you can accustom and know other cultures, languages, and taste their local food. For instance, last year I went to Turkey with my friends, the country which has a different language and wealthy history and culture. We saw their ritual ceremony, visited different villages and talked to local people about their culture and religion. The most interesting part of our trip was eating Turkish local food.
To make a long story short, all the above mentioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that traveling internationally gives more benefits to people. This is because you have the opportunity to experience different ecology, nature, and climates, and to see varied cultures, languages and foods. Hence, I suggest everyone journey outside of their own country.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17168674699 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74049876896 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563253012048 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2464705701 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3684210526 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344448047319 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920192867695 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121920185717 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209468198906 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125315987553 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.