Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone."
Making a decision is one of those issues that have far-reaching repercussions in different aspects of individuals’ life. Thanks to the significance of decision making in our current and future life, people need to spend time to take into consideration its ups and downs. In this regard, I am of the opinion that people should deliberate and consult with experienced people instead of applying their ideas in solitude. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on this viewpoint.
First and foremost, consulting with well-rounded people culminates in making a wise decision. With the pace of life speeding up, and with this galloping rate in which societies are flourishing, decisions play noticeable roles in people’s life. Whether they are about getting married, finding a decent job, making friends, or choosing a major for university, all of them requires manifold deliberations because of its overriding effects on our prospect life. By consulting with wise, experienced people, we can figure out and unravel muted aspects of decisions. Assume a secondary student preparing for a college or a university. And, he has difficulty finding which major to choose, leading a sense of agitation and anxiety. In this respect, visiting a consultant and accomplishing some psychological tests will help him be cognizant about inside out of numerous aspects of various majors. So, not only can he choose the right major in accordance with his abilities and interests, but he will also make sure about its positive consequences about finding an appropriate vocation after graduation. Therefore, this example obviously reveals the momentous influence of deciding with a well-rounded person.
Moreover, using others point of views will save time to make an effective decision. To be more elucidate, there are times that people cannot make a decision effectively by virtue of being too meticulous. Admittedly, it has been acknowledged that the right decision should be made at the right time. Perhaps spending much time for some intentions would be ended in losing some benefits. Imagine that a large electronic device store provided considerable, fascinating discounts for some brands of laptops. A person will miss the limited time offered for the discount if he takes a lot of time seeking which brand will be suitable. So, for fussy people, it would be substantially advantageous to use others’ advice to buy a laptop. So beneficial is the importance of regarding some people’s opinion because this measure will be conducive to saving time and money as a miscellaneous discount.
In the final analysis, it can be concluded that using the ideas of experienced, cognizant people would be imperative to make a wise decision. This is because individuals can make an informed decision, along with saving time to make an effective and efficient determination.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.353200883 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13152845691 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560706401766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4610868085 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.434782609 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6956521739 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04347826087 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13653031565 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441048556409 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361957067947 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964250102536 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202151098042 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.