Nowadays, a modern, fast-paced, high-pressure life is dependent on internet access. Some individuals demand free access to the world wide web; however, this no-fee facility has some negative facets which would damage the society’s structure if governments guarantee this free service. I feel this way for two reasons which I will examine in this essay.
First, the younger generation’s curiosity can make the youth addicted to the internet due to its engaging content. Also, these pictures or videos are produced swiftly on an immense scale which is readily accessible via just a few clicks on their gadgets. This trait will stick people to their cell phones surfing social platforms, or watching videos if it causes no fee. Therefore, they are disturbed for a long time, and they are not able to spend their time learning skills or study.
Secondly, obesity is a significant disaster all over the world for every society. Offering free internet can encourage people to sit on a sofa and scroll down on websites instead of exercise or hang out with their friends. Evidently, people have a strong tendency to save their energy and avoid doing demanding activities. This is best exemplified by my personal experience. Last year, our university gave us free yearly internet on its anniversary, which was very intriguing. However, after a few months, the healthcare center warned the administrators to immediately cancel the annual gift internet as a huge number of students were sick due to lack of exercise and physical activity.
Finally, to my mind, the taxes and fees on the internet should stay remained. It is because younger people would overuse the internet by checking their social media consistently and lost the opportunity to study or gain a new skill. Also, free internet access will incline the obesity rate in human societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13289036545 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75473586077 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644518272425 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0950677514 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1917280033 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058736506448 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349973072836 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115399619975 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198072438156 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.