Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
nowadays, mainly in the increasingly crowded metropolis, the number of cars in use is growing at a dizzying pace. Whether this tendency could suffer a reduction or not in the future, though, it is a matter of intense debate. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that the amount of cars will maintain the growth tendency. this position is based on two main reasons that will be analyzed thoroughly below.
Firstly, <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre=""></span>citizens quantity is growing exponentially each year, and its correlation with the number of cars is directly proportional. it means that, if the population increase, the number of cars will suffer the same reaction. For example, a few years ago, in the city where I live, Havana, we were 2 million of people. Under those conditions, the public transportation service was wonderful and the traffic was supportable, especially out of the peak hours of the day. However, nowadays the number of people living in the city has grown so swiftly, that not only the bus services has almost collapsed, but also the insupportable traffic has become in a situation of national interest, owing to this city is the capital of the country.
Secondly, each year companies release more affordable cars with the aim to reach a bigger market portion. it is quite common, to see companies which are offering cars with zero down payment and extremely low prices, resulting in more competitive products. For example, four years ago, when I was a freshman university student, only a limited sector could pay for a car. but now, we readily could appreciate that the parking lots are not enough, due to the clear increment of people with cars. In order to find a solution to this problem, the university has taken different measurements, like offering fee discounts to those students who come to the campus in the same car, or reducing the cost of the campus bus.
In summation, I am of the opinion that it is almost impossible that <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="that "></span>cars presence in our cities decrease in the future. this is because the population growth does not show signs to slow down, and cars are economically more accessible each year. Therefore, if we travel to the future and take some pictures, they will show cities plagued by car.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, mainly in the increasingly crowded met...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...cars will maintain the growth tendency. this position is based on two main reasons t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...umber of cars is directly proportional. it means that, if the population increase,...
^^
Line 17, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e aim to reach a bigger market portion. it is quite common, to see companies which...
^^
Line 17, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...y a limited sector could pay for a car. but now, we readily could appreciate that t...
^^^
Line 17, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with cars. In order to find a solution to this problem, the university has take...
^^
Line 25, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e in our cities decrease in the future. this is because the population growth does n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19270833333 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.86768112029 2.67179642975 145% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5703125 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5466997749 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.294117647 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135232894549 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045946534116 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031725274236 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084783503388 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277972919324 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.