A glance at people attitudes toward public speaking, brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether taking public speaking courses assist student to overcome its fear or not. As a pharmacy graduate student, I believe that lectures and speeches are one of the important aspects of research and academic environment. Although most people think it is hard to speak in front of large audience, it is a crucial part of being educated and if the university require student to take public speaking courses, helps them to grow their speaking skill.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that at the end of the day we must present our project in outstanding seminar and conferences. If we cannot speak with confident, how people can trust our result? The assignment and exams in the public speaking courses enable students to improve their abilities and find new techniques to control their fear. For example, the teacher shows student how to breathe effectively to reduce the level of Carbon dioxide in the blood and as a result decrease their stress level. Thus, it is a great opportunity for student to learn the newest method of speaking.
Another reason that I should deem is the subtle point that, a good teacher can find our weak and strong points in our presentation that we are not aware. For example, when I was at the first semester of the university, I thought that I can present very well even in front of 1000 people, and actually I was. However, I had a small mistake. Under stress, I repeated " for example" more than normal and it showed the audience that I am not relaxed. After understanding my mistake, I practiced a lot hat home in front of mirror and recorded my voice to count "for example". After a while, I got successful to speak normally. Therefore, all pupils still need public speaking courses no matter what the level of their presentation is.
Nevertheless, some think that if the university require students to take such courses, it is boring for student who are good at presenting. In other words, they think that it will waste their precious time with no valuable outcome. However, I think even if a researcher is good enough in this skill, it is great to criticize his classmates presentation and make some comments. It helps him later when he finds an academic job in university as an instructor, assists his students to have a better speech. So, this requirement has a lot of direct and indirect benefits.
Due to the aforementioned discussion explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend students to take related courses to the public speaking even if they do not think it is necessary for them. On the other hand, the universities should require students to take such courses to enhance their speaking skills.
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 86
- •In order to attract more tourists, the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets. Which way do you think is more effective? 76
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84362139918 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74854300403 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0872894288 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238991172146 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683106022241 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651065197969 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150852793924 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753953988554 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.