Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Opinions diverge on whether students will learn more effectively when studying in groups or alone. Although some fervently advocates that working alone will boost students concentrating, I am at loggerheads with this opinion due to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, students have to put more responsibility when working in groups. This is required when having other people do the assignment together because the work might delay if a member does not finish the task on time. For example, when working in a project, each member will be assigned each job by a leader; thus, if only one member does not finish the duty on time, the whole project will be affected. This leads to the fact that students have to put more effort when doing the team work; hence, they can learn better when working in a team.
Further and more prominently, working together can help students to learn more skills such as team working, leadership or so on. This can be proved by the fact that when working in a team, students have to communicate with other members so that they can boost their communicating skills or a member who is leader needs to practice so that he or she can assign the task correctly with each individual. It is indisputable that these skills are needed in latter life so that if they can acquire perfectly at this stage, they can use it professionally when they need in the future. These all prove that working in team can be a successful way of learning.
Last but not least, working alone is not a good method because students are under heavy pressure. This means that students have many work to do if they do a project individually such as doing a presentation, doing a script, planning out things need to be done and so on. In stead, the work will be separated equally to the members in groups so that each individual will have less work to do; thus, the work will be completed in a high quality.
All things considered, working in a team can be a better learning method compared to studying alone because students can learn many good skills, the work can be divided equally and the pressure can be lower.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ng the team work; hence, they can learn better when working in a team. Further and m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...when they need in the future. These all prove that working in team can be a successfu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun work seems to be countable; consider using: 'many works'.
Suggestion: many works
...pressure. This means that students have many work to do if they do a project individually...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66756032172 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58438643642 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450402144772 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3391608177 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325212289216 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148950911648 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565420706511 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202664001975 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659153651301 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.