Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important that people should work together in order to boost their skills and productivity. There is no shortage of opinions that students learn more when they are assigned work individually. But I have a different belief. I would go in favor of the statement that teachers must assign projects to students in a group, so they can learn more. I prefer this because of two reasons which I elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, when students are assigned to do assignments in a group they get more innovative ideas as every brain is unique. In contrast, when students do the project alone, they rely solely on their understanding because of this they do not get something out of the box. So, when students work in a group they get another person's perspective too and in this way they discover a sea of knowledge and skills. This can be best exemplified by my personal experience. When I was in college we got a bunch of assignments from our teachers. Our pharmacognosy professor mostly assigns projects in a group. I learned a lot because all my group mates were very competitive and passionate about their work. If our teacher had not given assignments in groups then we would not be able to get tremendous knowledge about different aspects of pharmacognosy.
Secondly, working in a group helps students to prepare for the collaborative nature of the workspace. However, doing projects individually makes a person more self-centered and they mostly do not like any third person interference. Hence, when students work in groups they learn how to move as a team. As a result, students develop strong interpersonal skills, which are highly valued by their employers. For instance, my nephew is very introverted and has some difficulty in socializing and mingling with people. When he went to college his professors mostly assigned work in groups, which helped him a lot in boosting his confidence and also overcoming his introvert nature. To add on, this group study makes a dramatic change in his behavior and has a positive impact on his communication and interaction skills. Therefore, if his teachers had not assigned them group assignments then he would not have such a strong personality.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that working in a group has a positive impact on the students. This is because they get more innovative ideas and understanding and also it helps them to prepare for the mutual working nature of work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their understanding because of this they do not get something out of the box. So,...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...udents work in a group they get another persons perspective too and in this way they di...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... exemplified by my personal experience. When I was in college we got a bunch of assi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...titive and passionate about their work. If our teacher had not given assignments i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95180722892 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96128206435 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489156626506 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4260391526 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.347826087 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0434782609 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5652173913 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357973248829 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112240945192 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887172691496 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247555374329 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929545300441 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.