Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When you have been friends with someone for a long time it is important for you to continue the friendship even if that person does something you don’t like.
What is the main cornerstone that helps us cement and maintain a long-lasting friendship? Whenever this question arises, a general controversy erupts among people. Some people assert that it is of vital importance for us to tolerate our friends even if they have made something we don't like. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with this idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, tolerating the problems caused by your friends blindly will trigger even worse outcomes sometimes, and at that time it is advisable to break this relationship as soon as possible. To illustrate, your friends did something that disobeys the laws, and meanwhile, you are a law-abiding citizen. If you cannot persuade your friends to give up their illegal behaviors, you had better stop the relationship with them since you and your friends no longer share the same values and views of the world. If your friends always do something that hurt others' feelings and emotions, such as cheating on their girlfriends or boyfriends and intimate family partners. Although they don't do anything that exerts emotional traumatic effects on you, their actions still vividly demonstrate that they overlook others' virtues and values. This indicates that they may not have the ability to distinguish good and evil, right and wrong, which may lead to more immoral behaviors in the future.
In addition, we should also pay attention to the behaviors of our friends that really hurt us physically and mentally. At that moment, escaping from terrible relationships can be a wise choice because the foundation of the relationship has been damaged, and mutual trust will not appear anymore. For example, I used to play with one of my best friends, Lucy, when I was in high school. Since we were enduring too much pressure caused by parents and teachers at that time, we easily got upset and depressed. Instead of helping each other equally, Lucy always asked me for help without lending a hand to me whenever I met problems with my studies. Even worse, when she went to the edge of collapse owing to her bad grades, she always pushed me and hit me on the playground to vent her emotions. When I also got awful exam results, she would laugh at me for a long time. Eventually, I chose to stop this relationship for the sake of my mental and physical health.
Admittedly, some people attach great importance to long-lasting friendships, and maintain that tolerance of friends' weaknesses and mistakes should be emphasized if you want to keep the tree of friendship green forever. But I harbor the idea that not all friendships deserve to be treasured since people are always changing. Sometimes, if we are brave enough to stop toxic relationships, we are granted the chance to possess a better companion.
In a nutshell, I definitely don't advocate continuing the relationship if your friend does something that you cannot bear. Although no one is an isolated island and we all need accompanies, leaving immoral friends away may be a better choice under some certain circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nds even if they have made something we dont like. As far as I am concerned, I hardl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...intimate family partners. Although they dont do anything that exerts emotional traum...
^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mpanion. In a nutshell, I definitely dont advocate continuing the relationship if...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, really, so, still, while, for example, in addition, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2570.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96138996139 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79460942405 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4569948468 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.739130435 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5217391304 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29753959358 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07395382678 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682638769573 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146705088726 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442737358552 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.