Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate on what kind of job is more satisfying for workers. Personally, I am of the opinion that it is better to do similar tasks during workday. I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, it is more efficient when workers at different positions deal with specific tasks. Obviously, since everyone has limited energy, a person can only do a great job by putting all his efforts on it, and eventually becomes a professional. With all the professionals working together, the company as a whole can run smoothly without wasting time in going back and forth to check the entire process, hence workers are more satisfied. For example, in a large cellphone company there are multiple stations with each being in charge of a specific part of the phone, such as the screen, the processor or the battery. Staffs at each station have to do their best to make sure the part they are responsible for have the best quality. Consequently, the company can sell more products, and workers can benefit more from the increased profits of the company.
Secondly, doing similar tasks helps workers become more confident with what they are doing. Evidently, by repeating the same tasks over and over , workers can improve their skills and avoid making mistakes. On the other hand, doing multiple duties creates anxious environment for workers and increases the possibility of make errors. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. I used to work as an assistant for the director of my department, and I was stressed out everyday because of the diverse tasks I had to deal with, which make me feel lost about who I am. Now, as a dietitian my only job is to make sure my patient get the best treatment, and I am more confident than ever about my future. As we can see, focusing on specific tasks easily satisfies workers by promoting their confidence.
In conclusion, I am fully convinced that workers are more satisfied when doing repetitive tasks during workday. This is because workers can benefit more from the improved efficiency of the company and because they become more confident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y repeating the same tasks over and over , workers can improve their skills and av...
^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...f my department, and I was stressed out everyday because of the diverse tasks I had to d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the improved efficiency of the company and because they become more confident.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8252688172 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66039021828 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1397510911 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310845051792 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107219897248 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952603938297 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204071771579 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447026898076 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.