Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Whether workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long can be weighed in many aspects. However, not all workers are the same.

Admittedly, the claim appears to have considerable merits. Having diversified duties in some cases is preferrer over doing the homogenous tasks all day long. People may easily get bored if they are required to repeat similar behaviors all day long. The cashier is a kind of occupation that people usually regard as a part-time job, not only because of the low paid status but also its repetitive working duties. However, not all workers are the same.

When we speak of workers, the following can be put forth: workers with high-level specialties and workers with some relatively unskilled or low-skilled occupations. Obviously, workers with high-level specialties usually repeat similar duties all-day long, for example, computer engineers, who are used to coding all day long. But can we conclude that they are dissatisfied? Most of these high-skilled jobs usually require people with a certain level of degrees such as a Master of even a Ph.D. In order to obtain these degrees, people may have huge interests in certain fields, and thus it is unlikely they are dissatisfied when they repeat the routine tasks in the fields they love.

Moreover, the author of this claim falsely assumes that every worker prefers diversity over homogeneity. Some workers prefer simplicity because they only need to polish one skill for their job, this will save their time and allow them to have more leeway doing other stuff they like. It may also make their tasks easier to complete since they are doing the same thing all day long, thus increase their working performance and even their salary. In this case, doing similar tasks all day long provides them satisfaction.

In summary, the statement is not as persuasive as it stands. Different types of tasks may keep workers away from boredom, but not every worker's situation is the same. If the worker has a huge interest in the task he or she is doing, or the worker prefers simplicity, the statement will not hold. According to my exposition, I fundamentally disagree with the statement.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether workers are more satisfied when they ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...orkers away from boredom, but not every workers situation is the same. If the worker ha...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in summary, kind of, such as, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99734748011 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58347812239 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506631299735 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7437314666 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1578947368 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469980803449 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14072269023 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135608112312 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294136010922 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163438629048 0.0645574589148 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether workers are more satisfied when they ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...orkers away from boredom, but not every workers situation is the same. If the worker ha...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in summary, kind of, such as, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99734748011 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58347812239 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506631299735 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7437314666 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1578947368 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469980803449 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14072269023 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135608112312 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294136010922 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163438629048 0.0645574589148 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.