Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Whether the movies and television have more negative effects than positive on the way young people behave can be weighed in many aspects. However, the statement is flawed because it relies on various assumptions.
Admittedly, the speaker's claim appears to have considerable merit. Movies and television do have some negative effects on the way young people behave. Some dramas on screen include fighting plot and violence scene many mislead young people to some improper behaviors. However, the statement fails to provide a precise litmus test measuring "movies and television". When we speak of "movies" or "television", the following can be put forth: violent types, didactic types, and some amusing types. Obviously, the latter two provide more positive effects than negative effects on young people.
It is thus justifiable to take all kinds of movies and television series into account, and we will find the statement problematic. Amusing movies bring people happiness with some jokes, hardly can it distort young people's mind. Didactic movies teach young people what is the right thing to do, it can also be rare to affect kids in negative ways. Although violent movies may misguide youths to the wrong path, given the various types of movies, it could only act as a drop in a bucket compared to the rest of the movie industry.
Moreover, the speaker falsely assumes that young people can easily access violent movies or series without any restriction. Many countries set policies or laws to forbid people below a certain age to get into the cinema for some types of movies. Under such policies, the chance of young people get in touch with violent movies is confined, let alone the possibility they get affected by them. Since the access to movies with more negative effects is prohibited, the remains they face are those movies with more positive influences.
In summary, the claim is not as persuasive as it stands. Although some types of movies do bring more negative effects than positive effects, the speaker fails to specify which type of movie is being discussed here and falsely presumes that youths can easily get access to improper types of movies. Thus, according to my exposition, I fundamentally disagree with the statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19836956522 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81890679643 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513586956522 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.332479034 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.684210526 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84210526316 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375033359195 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130365311925 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121029027786 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239871574688 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679177147309 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.