Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
According to my point of view, it is difficult question to answer because it depends on each person's demand, interest, and view whether a certain worker is satisfied when he has many different types of tasks to do during the workday, or he prefers doing similar tasks all day long. I think each method has its own advantages and disadvantages and it depends on various situations and circumstances. I hold this opinion because of several reasons.
On one hand, when workers have different types of tasks to do during their workday, they should be experienced and specialized in their tasks, which seems relatively impossible. In other words, if a particular worker is responsible for doing several types of tasks during his workday, he should be able to handle those works efficiently, which requires solid knowledge and sufficient skills to do so. These conditions harden for workers to deal with manifold problems that relates to their work, because they should cope with managing different crisis while they are working, and it seems a heavy burden for them. However, working in different types of tasks assist workers to get rid of boredom and ennui and keep them fresh and energetic while they are doing their work, because they are not faced to boring and repetitive duties. Besides, this method might enhance the productivity and creativity of employees, which can be beneficial both for employees and employers.
On the other hands, doing repetitious tasks all day longs has its upsides and downsides. Doing certain duties under specific circumstances does not require various knowledge and experience. If a worker wants to gain success in his work career, he should be connoisseur only in his profession, which helps labors and employees better concentrate on their particular task. Additionally, doing different things during workday may distracts workers and it will results in destructive consequences.
In general, both styles have their own benefits and detriments, but what is important is focusing on job in order to improve the efficiency and exploit the best opportunities to achieve success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- two 3
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubts on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- abds 3
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubts on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...certain worker is satisfied when he has many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orkday may distracts workers and it will results in destructive consequences. In...
^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...kday may distracts workers and it will results in destructive consequences. In genera...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, while, i think, in general, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21764705882 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81926148027 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.075234499 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.461538462 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38145225131 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130562522603 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114276654736 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204811521666 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110139019933 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.