It is cryptically clear that leader, who manages a group of people, is ana pivotal and inevitable part of not only our life but also almost every work in a daily basis group. Every group includes a team, who work on a project, a company, organization or even a country needs to be managed by someone. Without any manager who controls all of the processes of reaching the group goal, successful will not come and they are liable to culminate with fail. Any society definitely has a leader who consults the people to execute desirable agendas. Besides, even when we are at school working on a group project, someone controls the budget and time of the project as a supervisor. Some people believe that these people are innately leaders. Whereas others believe that it is learnable to be a leader. Personally, I am in favor with the latter group for two legitimate reasons, which are detailed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the leader must have some special characteristics such as wisdom, decisive. Although all of the people cannot learn these special characteristics some people can learn them during their lifetime. These traits are not innate personalities, which are not learnable. As a case in point, you can one of those characters as being sociable. Based on some research, it is not innate. In other words, if someone is shy and is not sociable, it does not mean they cannot change. These people can change into a sociable person. To be more tangible, when I was teaching at the university as a lecturer, one of my students was such people. She even was afraid of contributing to the class conversation. I recommend her some advice, which was useful for her to be more sociable. At the end of a semester, she was so sociable that she liked to solve an example, which I ask them to solve on the board.
Moreover, the world has been changed in every basis. If leadership is naturally, so in the volatile problem of the world, how they can make a good decision, which has a considerable impact on a multitude of people. To take a good decision they need to learn about a string and dependent series of events. It goes without saying, making a good decision is not an innate thing in people personalities.
To sum up, I completely agree with the idea that leadership does not come naturally. Not only do leader have to have some learnable characteristic but also they have to make some decision, which needs to learn some other things. Every society should select someone who can make a good decision in not only good condition but also bad situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...meone. Without any manager who controls all of the processes of reaching the group goal, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 737, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that these people are innately leaders. Whereas others believe that it is learnable to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aracteristics such as wisdom, decisive. Although all of the people cannot learn these sp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tics such as wisdom, decisive. Although all of the people cannot learn these special chara...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: PRP_MD_CD_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can use one' or 'can be one'?
Suggestion: can use one; can be one
... not learnable. As a case in point, you can one of those characters as being sociable. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69469026549 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73086290131 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488938053097 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8809669182 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6153846154 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146885289972 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403962292865 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477235507029 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853073013907 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285182380147 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.