Without the shadow of doubt, parents has played an important role in children's education. As far as I am concerned parents pay more attention to their children's education. Among myriad reasons which can support my idea, I delve into the most conspicuous ones, which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
First and foremost, the decrease in the number of children in a family has caused parents to put more time for them. The fewer the children the more the share they receive. In the past parents should have dealt with more children but now a days we can see that each family is consist of less than three children. For instance in my family I have only a sibling while my father has seven. As he once told me his father never knew where he even studied while now my father always asks me how are my grades and is completely involved in my education process. My father always used to come to my school and visit my teachers regularly.
Second, the trend of life has changed from past. In older times, children were a source of income for the family and as a result they should have started to look for a job in early ages in order to provide for their family instead of going to school. So education was not a primary interest for parents. For example, I am 27 years old and I am still studying in university but my mom started to work when she was eighteen. Working could occupy parents and children at the same time and as a consequence there were no time for education anymore.
Last but not the least reason is finding job depends heavily on how educated one is. Parents wants to see their children prosper so they are concerned for their children future opportunity while in the past finding a work was not a major issue and so parents were not worried if their children could find a suitable job or not. An example can illustrate my point, in the past children could follow their parents steps or find another job as a result of industrialization of the countries. So abundant job meant higher opportunity to find a job but base on today's life experience finding a job can be really competitive. A friend of mine whose name was Billy could not find a job even though he was well educated but his father with no writing skill found a job when he was a youth easily.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that based upon today's lifestyle finding job, change in life trends, and the decrease in the number of children in a family caused parent to put more time for their children education. Actually there are some other reasons and examples advocated the claim which is not mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... important role in childrens education. As far as I am concerned parents pay more ...
^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...hould have dealt with more children but now a days we can see that each family is consist ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...d have dealt with more children but now a days we can see that each family is consist ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...w a days we can see that each family is consist of less than three children. For instan...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 557, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...r opportunity to find a job but base on todays life experience finding a job can be re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, really, second, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53014553015 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48079748857 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47817047817 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2424364694 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.761904762 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9047619048 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255132271011 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850432056668 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069743961991 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152411260836 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368207825569 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.