The fast pace of modern life has exerted grandiose impacts on the work performances when employees are supposed to multitask at the same time. I ascertain that the more missions are, the fallout humans can derive.
Admittedly, due to the wide range of jobs to be implemented, workers are inclined to be unfocused. If there is only one thing to be carried out, they can figure out the potential outcomes as well as concentrate more on the details, which can bring back the best upshot. By contrast, with the limited time course, the problems are not likely to be addressed meticulously because workers seem to get hurried and pass unexpected core parts. In the last few years, I was held accountable for a project which cost millions of dollars. Unfortunately, with multiple problems coincidentally coming up, although I recognized the catastrophic outcome, I, under the pressure of time, ignored and tried to veil smaller issues. Finally, what I received was the absolute failure and no respects from other members.
Further and even more importantly, though, stressors from heavy load of tasks can drag the work efficiency. Scientifically, most of mundane people who are not good at time management skill find it arduous to cope with stress. Furthermore, the responsibilities to tackle multitasks buried on the shoulder appears to spark a stressful life, which is the start for never-ending mistakes. The reason is that once people get stressed, they are not conscious enough to give accurate response and evaluation, leading to the arbitrary and swift decisions made. As a consequence, this movement can bring back the most grievous commission.
By way of conclusion, there are no merits for handling multi-tasks within a certain amount of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons are, the fallout humans can derive. Admittedly, due to the wide range of job...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, incidentally, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15087719298 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98575668765 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659649122807 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1362353803 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0682542903461 0.236089414692 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191136265582 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253343527241 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0289432188658 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295763085172 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.