Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
The advent of different transportation ways has enabled a major paradigm shift to people’s daily life, and it was so significant that it had an undeniable role in virtually any industry. Many have been debating whether or not the governemnt should allocate more funds on internet infrastructure than public transportation. In some situations a good internet is very important and indispensable, however, public transportation has a more important role in peoples lives. In my view, government should not expend more budget to internet access in contrast to public transportation.
The first and foremost reason is that the public transportation have a crucial effect on price of all goods, and consequently affects people’s daily life. A pertinent example can shed light on this assertion. Three years ago, an abrupt increase in fuel’s price made a surge in the price of all goods. From vegetables to milk, meat and even the bread. When the price of was swelled, transportation was more expensive, therefore the farmer had to spend more money for the gasoline. On the other hand shipment of cattle was affected and this made a cascade negative impact on the economy of our country. After month of protest, the government decreased the fee of fuel and things backed to normal. As can be seen, a decision which had affected public transportation, led to lots of reactions from people and compelled the government to accept its mistake
Another reason that should be taken into account is that the budget of making roads, subways, airports etc is markedly more than an excellent internet access requirements. For instance, These days, the price of raw oil is ascending in a high rate, and it can have a great impact on transportation conditions. raw oil which is converted to a large number of products is an undegradable part of the asphalt, which is base of the roads. Moreover, gasoline price is also directly related to the price of oil. On the other hand, experts in the field of Information Technology are finding newer and more convenient way for internet access which makes it cheaper. In nutshell, expenses of the public transportation system is growing in a staggering rate, while technology is introducing new generations of cheaper internet infrastructure.
According to the reasons mentioned above, administrators should not invest more on internet than public transportation because of two reasons. First, it controls prices of many goods which deals with peoples daily needs. What is more, public transportation need much more efforts and financial resources to be improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...y any industry. Many have been debating whether or not the governemnt should allocate more fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Raw
...at impact on transportation conditions. raw oil which is converted to a large numbe...
^^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nditions. raw oil which is converted to a large number of products is an undegradable part of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in my view, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22921348315 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13580187147 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521348314607 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6846348173 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.772727273 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386336338764 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120366924401 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169996054828 0.0737576698707 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329574237656 0.150856017488 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.339552681366 0.0645574589148 526% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.