Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people's attitudes toward universities' budgets brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether improvement of the quality of education is correlated to professors' salaries or not. Although some students assert that educators with satisfying salaries tend to teach more passionate, I, as a graduate business student, believe that there is no significant relationship between lecturers' income and the quality of education.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that the quality of pedagogy is affected by several more important factors, such as laboratory equipment, the teacher to students ration, and students' motivation to learn, to name but a few. Recent studies conducted by Harvard University, department of adult academic education, show that universities' ranking of public and private schools were completely irrelevant to the professors' salary since the Princeton is the first on the list with the 20th average income of instructors. The most determinant factor for students is research facilities to assist them in understanding the new ongoing research well and practice what they have learned theoretically. Therefore, the salaries of professors do not have anything to do with the quality of training, and the universities should not allocate their budget to it.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that when people have a high secure salary, they are not passionate about improving their skills and knowledge and get promotions. For example, one of my lecturers in the college was a full professor, and he did not any further steps to take, so he worked less than other assistant professors and did not respond to students' questions patiently. Thus, humans want to satisfy their ambitious feelings, and without it, they do not seek improvements.
Admittedly, there are some advantages to high salaries for professors. If a university wants to absorb outstanding professors to perform substantial experiments, it should devote enough funds for their salaries. Well-known instructors ask for a decent income, which is completely reasonable. Nevertheless, the rise in salaries should be competitive, and lecturers still try to obtain it. In fact, the income must be proportional to their specialties and experience.
Due to the aforementioned arguments explored in the previous statements, I personally claim that even if a university increases its professors' wages, it cannot ensure that they work more efficiently and dedicate most of their time to the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...hools were completely irrelevant to the professors salary since the Princeton is the first...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40897755611 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08698164274 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598503740648 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.307035651 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7333333333 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262232328931 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829704922202 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644347520068 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137954489542 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053871143084 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.