Do you agree or disagree?
Life today is more comfortable than when your grandparents were children.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people nowadays are living a contemporary lifestyle. In this regard, advancement in technology is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debate among scholars on whether the living standard of today is more convenient or the era of our grandparents when they were young was more uncomplicated. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea that current life is way more comfortable than the previous generations. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my viewpoint is that with the advent of technology, doing home chores have become trouble-free and time-saving. Technology is such a science that has provided machines to assist people to do daily tasks. It is notable that these operating appliances have not only taken human labor but also very efficient in working huge amounts of work in less time. Vividly, the comfortable life we have today could only be achieved by the establishment in the field of technology. By way of illustration, 50 years ago my grandmother was used to do laundry, cleaning dishes, and cleaning the floor by hand with the use of some tools. She tells me about how she used to get tired after doing all home daily tasks. She could not even find time to maintain her own health. As a result, she started to look old at a very early stage. However, nowadays I have washing machines, dishwashers and vacuum machines which made our life easy. I just pop in all the clothes and dishes. The rest work is done by the machines. Ultimately, I get some time for myself to do daily skincare. This example clarifies that the use of machines has made our life so comforting as compared to the past.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that the way we travel today to other places has become very effortless. Thanks to the modernization, we have cars, buses, and planes today which really aid us in getting to the office or grocery stores. On the other hand, in the past, people used to walk miles to get to their work daily. They had ships in order to travel to other countries but it would take months. Our way of communication has really eased our comfort.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although the kind of life our grandparents had was a gem, the living of today is more reliable. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, the daily task has become easy with the help of modern technology, second, the advancement in transportation has increased people compliance. As for the writer's advice, I vehemently urge people to appreciate the way of lifestyle we have today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...oung was more uncomplicated. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea that c...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 101, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...h the kind of life our grandparents had was a gem, the living of today is more reli...
^^^
Line 8, column 377, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...increased people compliance. As for the writers advice, I vehemently urge people to app...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, so, as for, kind of, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78315789474 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79931610168 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.821602438 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3846153846 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2692307692 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181816739221 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429408949493 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563075745301 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112551356338 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569484047585 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.