Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes
Throughout the history, numerous people have conveyed their information or experienced through their books. With the advent of camera and cinema, movies are accounted as other tools that people utilize to exchange their information. A plethora of people is in the conviction that books and movies are useful mediums to get acquainted with people's features. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that the imaginary characteristics are not reliable sources to help get familiar with others. I am of the opinion that, the level of learning from books or movies depends on the different factors, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, dozens of books and movies release daily (), but the question is how much of these sources are truly worthy? Undoubtedly, reading most of these published books are futile; therefore, if someone wants to read a book, or watch a movie with the purpose of something specific, should apply the considerable amount of attention to make an accurate and appropriate decision. Even the imaginary situations and characters are far more valuable if they have been created by the right person. Consequently, the well-known writers or directors would be the wise options to guarantee the usefulness of the particular book. On the other hand, popularity is not the only element as there are some people who are expertise in the specific field; so getting aware of this matter will be helpful to restrict the choices and leads individual to better decisions. For instance, one of my friends is not a very famous director, but she has a unique talent in documentary films; and of course, book-readers are the primary people that can propose incredible suggestions.
Another Crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is what an ultimate goal of getting familiar from others' people life. Some people use it as a pastime, while it is a serious issue for others. If the person wants to watch movies in order to extract absolute solution for definite circumstance, watching a movie may be not a sensible choice since the reality including other conditions that is not stable most of the time. Otherwise, looking that film can be a logical deed to perceive the situation.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that the level () of using the books or movies is far more depended on the originality of the sources as well as the intention of this action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dozens of books and movies release daily , but the question is how much of these s...
^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e only element as there are some people who are expertise in the specific field; so get...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned above, I am convinced that the level of using the books or movies is far more...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'of course', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236080178174 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.153674832962 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0957683741648 0.0866891130778 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534521158129 0.046263068375 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.022271714922 0.0685040099705 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124721603563 0.118717715034 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0400890868597 0.0351676179071 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80119785244 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267260579065 0.0309702414327 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.122494432071 0.0887237588012 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0178173719376 0.0209618222197 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0178173719376 0.0139019557991 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2479.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03163017032 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377128953771 0.338922669872 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294403892944 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192214111922 0.174417080927 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131386861314 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80119785244 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.524397521467 107% => OK
Word variations: 65.8322528044 59.2087087015 111% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6875 20.5533526081 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0134926632 48.84282405 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.9375 120.699889404 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 20.5533526081 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.644075263715 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 55.1278892944 45.7405998639 121% => OK
Elegance: 1.74757281553 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24644636378 0.300154397459 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119083480257 0.103427244359 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0581084065822 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.558252098309 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152823622277 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114207732639 0.114077575197 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458961642887 0.0781384742642 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402540638581 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117661171501 0.067059652881 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183171631908 0.210909579961 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388108534864 0.0618886996521 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.