do you agree or disagree with this statement
because advertisements are less honest now, so people begin to less rely on ads
Currently, advertisements have already been recognized as one of the most common things in our lives. However, there is an issue that whether people still rely on advertisements today, because advertisements are less honest than advertisements before. While some people believe that advertisements still provide useful information that individuals still can use, the view of others is that there is too much unreliable information offered by ads, people have already ignored them. The latter point of the view, I believe, is more reasonable
To begin with, people cannot satisfy the productions introduced by advertisements after buying them. This is because many companies to attract more consumers will describe their commodities by using an exaggerated way. For example, Kang, a brand of instant noodles, usually describes that there are a lot of meats in their noodle. Furthermore, the leaders of Kang claim that their noodles contain all kinds of fresh vegetables, such as tomatoes, eggplants. On the contrary, in fact, after being testified, there is no real beef in their noodles, and tomatoes or eggplants offered in these noodles usually are less fresh than their introductions. It is not hard to imagine how an individual felt uncomfortable after buying a cup of Kang’s noodles after watching their advertisements.
Secondly, hardly will citizens have enough money to buy what they want after going to a real market to buy after watching ads. This is because the majority of advertisements in order to tempt more shoppers, they will express how cheap their products are. However, in real situations, most of them will charge more money from buyers by using other reasons. For example, there is a factory selling beds, normally in the TV programs, they will express that their beds usually are cheaper 30 percent than other firms. In this case, some watchers will be attracted by this information. In this case, they will go to this bed company to buy a cheap bed. However, after arriving at the real market, the employees of this company begin to say that it is true that our beds are cheaper than others’, but buyers must buy a closet if they want to buy a bed. Obviously, some people will not have enough money to buy a new bed because of this reason.
In conclusion, since today advertisements usually provide some unrealistic information and real situations usually charge more money. In this case, I still insist that today advertisements usually are less honest, so people usually do not want to rely on the information provide by advertisements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-25 | Bingdong Li | 73 | view |
- people prefer to cook food by themselves or eat at cafeteria 70
- do you agree or disagree with this statement because advertisements are less honest now so people begin to less rely on ads 73
- teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 73
- do you agree or disagree with this statement the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens 73
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11876484561 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89998364778 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479809976247 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6765676141 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.421052632 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195899635168 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070265874342 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864181807989 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135225136382 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524957192369 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.